When the White Home chief of workers, Jeffrey Zients, met with dozens of prime executives in Washington this month, he encountered a well-recognized record of company complaints about President Biden.

The executives on the Enterprise Roundtable, a gaggle representing a number of the nation’s largest companies, objected to Mr. Biden’s proposals to boost taxes. They questioned the shortage of enterprise illustration within the Cupboard. They bristled at what they known as overregulation by federal businesses.

Whereas the assembly was not antagonistic, it was indicative of three and a half years of government grousing about Mr. Biden. Enterprise leaders have criticized his remarks on “company greed” and his look on a union picket line. They chafe on the actions of officers he has appointed — significantly the top of the Federal Commerce Fee, Lina Khan, who has moved to dam a sequence of company mergers.

Plenty of outstanding figures in Silicon Valley and on Wall Road — together with the enterprise capitalists David Sacks and Marc Andreessen, and the hedge fund magnate Kenneth Griffin — have grown more and more vocal of their criticism of Mr. Biden, their reward of former President Donald J. Trump, or each.

Nonetheless, that shift principally displays motion amongst executives who already supported Republican politicians however had not beforehand embraced Mr. Trump. There may be little proof of a serious shift in allegiance amongst executives away from Mr. Biden and towards Mr. Trump.

Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale College of Administration professor who’s in frequent contact with company leaders, mentioned most chief executives he had spoken to most well-liked Mr. Biden to Mr. Trump, “a few of them enthusiastically and a few of them biting their lip and holding their nostril.”

Executives who’ve donated to Democrats up to now typically proceed to take action: Filings launched by the Federal Election Fee final week confirmed donations to Mr. Biden’s marketing campaign committees from enterprise leaders together with Marissa Mayer, the previous Yahoo chief, and Brad Smith, the Microsoft president — each of whom just lately hosted Biden fund-raisers — and from Mark Cuban, the tech investor.

And regardless of refined indicators of waning enthusiasm for Mr. Biden amongst enterprise elites, neither the White Home nor the Biden marketing campaign appear significantly involved. They see their insurance policies on taxation and regulation as efficient and broadly in style. They usually cite file company income below Mr. Biden’s presidency.

Nonetheless, the administration has taken steps to enhance its relationship with enterprise leaders. In February, a crew together with Mr. Zients and Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen divided up a listing of greater than 100 chief executives to contact, White Home officers mentioned. In Might, the president met with company leaders together with executives of Marriott, United Airways and Xerox.

Administration officers say suggestions from executives has led to coverage shifts, as when the Environmental Safety Company softened new necessities to cut back automotive and truck emissions after listening to from automakers.

“We’re not going to agree with companies on every little thing, however what we’re going to do is, we’re speaking to them,” Wally Adeyemo, the deputy Treasury secretary, who steadily meets with enterprise leaders, mentioned in an interview.

The enterprise world’s frustrations with Mr. Biden partly come all the way down to model and rhetoric. Mr. Biden has harangued firms for “ripping folks off” by elevating costs and shrinking product parts, and he has chastised chief executives for lavish pay packages. He has aligned himself with organized labor extra typically and extra explicitly than previous Democratic presidents.

Mr. Biden’s rhetoric has offended even some in any other case sympathetic enterprise leaders. Mr. Sonnenfeld of Yale known as it “needlessly off-putting” and “self-destructive.” However it could resonate with the general public. In polls, People routinely blame massive companies for inflation, and majorities in both parties say they view huge enterprise negatively general.

Past atmospherics, quite a lot of Biden administration insurance policies have grated on enterprise leaders. Mr. Biden has proposed elevating the company tax fee to twenty-eight p.c, from 21 p.c (although nonetheless under the 35 p.c that prevailed till the tax cuts signed by Mr. Trump), and to remove varied industry-specific tax breaks. He has additionally proposed elevating taxes on rich people — a gaggle that features many executives and their largest traders. And his administration has issued or proposed stricter guidelines on environmental safety, employee security and shopper rights.

Lots of these insurance policies are unsurprising for a Democratic president — as are the complaints they draw from enterprise leaders. Research published in 2022 discovered that about 70 p.c of prime executives at S&P 500 firms recognized themselves as Republicans.

However in some areas, the Biden White Home and its regulatory appointees have been extra aggressive than different current Democratic administrations.

“I feel the regulatory agenda that we’ve seen in some areas within the present administration has been troubling,” mentioned Brad Shut, the president of the Nationwide Federation of Unbiased Enterprise, a small-business advocacy group, echoing issues expressed privately by many companies, each massive and small.

Particular person industries have their very own complaints. Airways are upset by Mr. Biden’s efforts to crack down on “junk charges” and to require refunds for delayed flights. Pharmaceutical firms have sued to dam the administration’s efforts to barter decrease costs for medicine for older adults. Nonunionized building firms are livid about rules requiring agreements between contractors and unions on massive federal initiatives.

“That’s a spear in our coronary heart,” mentioned Milton Graugnard, government vp at Cajun Industries, an industrial building agency in Baton Rouge, La. “It’s damning and damaging to our {industry},” added Mr. Graugnard, a Trump donor up to now, “and I do know it’s going to drive prices up.”

Nonetheless, different industries have praised the administration, significantly for the lots of of billions of {dollars} in funding in infrastructure, inexperienced vitality and home manufacturing ensuing from laws it helped enact.

“Our relationship with the Biden administration is a really productive one, particularly because it pertains to shared coverage priorities,” mentioned Kip Eideberg, senior vp of presidency relations for the Affiliation of Gear Producers, which represents firms that construct building and agricultural tools.

Mr. Eideberg criticized the administration on different points, like commerce coverage, the place Mr. Biden has maintained tariffs, first imposed below Mr. Trump, that make imported components and supplies costlier. However he mentioned the Biden administration had been much more open to session than the Obama administration, which he mentioned appeared to have “little or no curiosity in proactively participating with the enterprise neighborhood.”

The Biden administration argues that no matter completely different industries would possibly say about their insurance policies, companies look like backing Mr. Biden in a much more essential approach: with investments.

The quarterly enhance in funding below Mr. Biden has been similar to the development below Mr. Trump earlier than the pandemic — despite the fact that the Federal Reserve has raised rates of interest by 5 proportion factors throughout Mr. Biden’s presidency, a transfer that usually depresses funding.

A few of Mr. Biden’s business-world backers cite a extra elementary cause for his or her help: Mr. Trump’s presidency was characterised by frequent coverage reversals and near-constant uncertainty, they are saying. Many are additionally involved about his strategy to immigration and commerce, and in regards to the risk that Mr. Trump may search to undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve.

On the session with the Enterprise Roundtable executives, who met with Mr. Trump the identical day, Mr. Zients burdened Mr. Biden’s dedication to stability and the rule of regulation.

“A variety of them — and I do that for a residing on daily basis, work with C.E.O.s in huge firms — a number of them view this as a selection between predictability and readability on the one hand and unpredictability and chaos on the opposite,” mentioned Roger Altman, senior chairman of the funding financial institution Evercore, who held Treasury positions below Presidents Jimmy Carter and Invoice Clinton.

Steven Cheung, the Trump marketing campaign’s communications director, responded: “President Trump continues to be warmly acquired by the enterprise neighborhood and recommended for his coverage proposals on deregulation and tax cuts. The clear distinction is a pro-growth economic system that benefited all People below President Trump versus Joe Biden’s failed file of skyrocketing inflation and business-killing mandates.”

Essentially the most potent anger from the enterprise neighborhood towards the present administration is commonly directed at regulators, significantly Gary Gensler, the Securities and Change Fee chair, and Ms. Khan of the Federal Commerce Fee.

Vinod Khosla, a outstanding enterprise capitalist who performed host to Mr. Biden on a fund-raising swing to Silicon Valley final month, excoriated Ms. Khan at a convention this month as “not a rational human being.”

However Mr. Khosla isn’t abandoning his help for Mr. Biden.

“Lina isn’t an important a part of the Biden presidency,” he mentioned in an e-mail. “And Trump is much worse than Lina in 10 dimensions.”

Keith Rabois, Mr. Khosla’s colleague on the agency Khosla Ventures, sees issues in a different way. Mr. Rabois, a longtime entrepreneur and investor, is a conservative, however he didn’t help Mr. Trump in 2016 or 2020. Now he’s doing so, partially due to Ms. Khan’s strategy, however primarily due to what he noticed as Mr. Biden’s lackluster help for Israel and Jewish college students on faculty campuses.

Mr. Khosla’s and Mr. Rabois’s divergent conclusions — regardless of their shared criticisms — mirror a bigger sample. Enterprise leaders who’ve supported Mr. Biden up to now principally nonetheless do, although some extra quietly or with extra reservations than earlier than. And a few Republican executives who have been as soon as skeptical of Mr. Trump or backed him quietly have develop into extra public of their help.

Charles Elson, the founding director of the John L. Weinberg Middle for Company Governance on the College of Delaware, mentioned a lot of those that nonetheless most well-liked Mr. Biden had develop into extra quiet of their help — not essentially due to his insurance policies however due to a way that Mr. Trump may win.

“They’ve simply stopped speaking,” Mr. Elson mentioned. “That’s all. They realized it’s too near name, it’s higher to say nothing. You by no means will be attacked for what you didn’t say.”

Reid J. Epstein contributed reporting.